Young trustees have more to offer than working on youth campaigns

People say to me that young people should be on charity boards because they can help to deliver projects for young people. During my trusteeships, it’s become apparent that this argument is: a) not strong enough, b) not convincing enough, or c) is tokenistic and patronising.

It demonstrates some of the sector’s leaders’ ignorance about the potential talent of young people. But to really make a difference in the governance of an organisation and to ensure that participation is meaningful, an organisation’s board has to be convinced.

As a trustee, sometimes my naivety and lack of knowledge is exactly what is needed during a board discussion. I’ll ask a question on what seems to be a simple issue, and more often than not other trustees around the table admit they weren’t quite following the conversation or understanding all of the technical points that were being made.

Since I started as a trustee, my role within the organisations with which I work has changed. Initially, I only dealt with youth and participation issues. Now I’m involved in marketing, communications, digital needs, fundraising strategies, organisational risks and the recruitment of trustees and CEOs.

Of course, I still have a lot to learn, which is why young trustees must utilise the knowledge of the rest of their board and staff. I’ve learnt from colleagues and fellow trustees, who have always been open and willing to help.

Young people are particularly effective at scrutinising programming, communication and fundraising outputs. I think we offer a unique level of untapped potential and ability. In marketing and communications young people can offer excellent input into discussions around modern marketing techniques. Social networking and media are becoming more influential in charity marketing, fundraising and general communications.

We have naturally incorporated Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, and YouTube into own everyday lives; whereas some more experienced professionals have had to consciously learn and adapt to the fast growing market. I’m not suggesting our input is infallible, but combined with the expertise of trained colleagues, who have invaluable experience on the disciplines of communication, we can offer a much more valid, relevant and powerful perspective.

Since joining, I’ve witnessed a change in the working culture and landscape at Plan. We now have young trustees in four  (Norway, Sweden, Finland & UK) of our seventeen national offices. This was not a joint collaboration, but rather a realisation by four offices that they were missing young potential.

However, there is still more convincing to be done. While these represent great steps forward for Plan, the big issue is still that young people remain disastrously under-represented on UK charity boards. With less than one per cent of trustees being under 25, while they represent 12 per cent of the UK population, we still have a lot of work to do.

Colleagues continue to underestimate the value that young people can bring to boards, and still think we can only deal with trivial issues. But I’m here to argue that that’s not the case.

  • Joseph Nagle

    This is great!

    I got tired of youth focussed non profits after a European Youth Forum meeting I went to during which the board (mostly in the late 20s/early 30s!) kept on talking about the role of ‘youth’ as though we should automatically have the right to attend meetings by virtue of our ‘youth’ and that we should focus on ‘youth issues’ because they are ones that matter to us

    I found it frustrating because I did not see my ‘youth’ as the reason for my being involved. At the time, I had just taken a job running a community centre in a multicultural area of Bradford so I actually did not want to be there because I was ‘young’; I wanted to be there to contribute to policy on an equal level because my views actually mattered and were quantifiable.

    One of the biggest barriers young people face is being underestimated by their older and ‘more experienced’ peers. The second biggest barrier young people face is continuing to think of themselves as ‘young’ and accepting or buying into the tokenistic and patronising attitudes of those around them.

    Well done for breaking the mould!

  • Dan Paskins

    Dear Richard,

    Thanks for your article. Through our Building Capabilities approach, we are providing £6 million in targeted support to local and specialist infrastructure through our Assist initiative, leveraging more than £37 million in support for voluntary organisations from the private sector via Business Connectors, and making at least £20 million available which frontline voluntary organisations will be able to use to choose and pay for high quality support services. It is arguably somewhat hyperbolic to suggest that these measures will lead to ‘the end of infrastructure’ or ‘exacerbate the problem’ of spending cuts in the public sector!

    In response to your specific points:

    1. I don’t agree that frontline and infrastructure are being ‘played off’ against each other. The report clearly notes that in many areas – from support for the underlying principles to sharing learning to key support needs – there was a great deal of consensus between respondents from infrastructure and frontline. In developing this approach, we’ve drawn on learning from working with thousands of frontline organisations. It shouldn’t be any great surprise that some frontline voluntary organisations have had some poor experiences of support from infrastructure, or that they are confident that they know best about the support that they need to flourish, for example.

    2. Our approach is intended to complement that of other funders, local as well as national. As page 8 of the report puts it:

    “Our approach is not an attempt to write a strategy for the whole of the voluntary sector about the single ‘correct’ way to build the skills and confidence of the sector. It is focused on where we think that we can add the most value through our funding, grant holders and relationship with sector. Our approach is intended to complement that of other funders who allocate their resources in different ways.

    For example, a local infrastructure organisation might receive core grant funding from the local authority or other local funders to provide a collective voice on behalf of local voluntary groups, and also offer support services which frontline organisations which receive a grant from the Lottery choose to pay for. A diverse range of funding approaches from different funders is likely to ensure the greatest sustainability of high quality services.”

    We are not arguing for a purist ‘demand-led world’ in which absolutely every support service is paid for by frontline voluntary organisations. We think that there should continue to be a diverse range of sources of funding. BIG has never been the biggest funder of local or national infrastructure and we can’t act as a ‘funder of last resort’ in every area where local or national government has withdrawn funding. Instead, we’ve taken some decisions about where we think our funding can make the greatest difference in order to help fulfil our mission to help communities and people most in need. If BIG is as influential as you believe, local public sector funders will take our advice and provide core funding for work such as collective voice for the voluntary sector!

    3. In terms of peer learning and access to free sources of information, these will be key features of the new BIG Assist initiative, which we are funding and NCVO are delivering on our behalf (more information at http://www.bigassist.org.uk ) Local and specialist infrastructure will be able to use this resource in order to get expert help in order to develop new ways of working, and to share learning and support each other. For example, we know that some local infrastructure organisations have developed excellent links with their local authorities. Through Assist, they will be able to share their knowledge about how to do this effectively with people in other areas where relations are more challenging.

    Assist will also develop an online menu of support services, which will help support providers which offer high quality services to make people aware of these and generate new income.

    We’ll also continue to monitor areas where information might not be sufficiently available. For example, we think that there is a specific need for us to invest around social investment to help voluntary organisations which are interested in social investment develop their investment readiness.

    4. One of the many good things about the Building Capabilities approach is that it will give our Funding Officers and local teams to have new opportunities to work with applicants and grant holders to help them fulfil their potential. We’ll be testing and learning about different approaches and the best ways to do this over the forthcoming months and years.

    5. We’ve based our approach on an analysis of the current capacity of the sector, including the consultation, a series of regional events, biannual surveys of support providers, delivery of BASIS and TLI grants and a wide array of other sources of information. We know, for example, that the situation is very different in different localities, that many support providers have been increasing the income that they generate and that we can’t attempt to meet every single possible need.

    One last comment for now (I eagerly await part two of your series!) We’ll be trying different approaches and making sure that we learn about how these work in order to have the greatest impact. We know that these are tough times for voluntary organisations, but Building Capabilities is part of our efforts to help voluntary organisations to build their skills and confidence, meet challenges and make the most of new opportunities. I hope that you and others will work with us as we develop this work, and continue to help us make sure that far from exacerbating any problems, it creates new opportunities and helps the ultimate beneficiaries – communities and people most in need.

  • Ivor Sutton

    While I feel that many will say it is good advice to ‘avoid party political activity’, I do not necessarily believe it is possible or right to disengage from forming political views and enhancing ones opinion on those views by managing a range of diverse activities in life.

    It does send a shiver down my spine when people say ‘they don’t like politics’ or they don’t have any view on it. Well, it’s part of our lives whether we like it or not. It influences us to be angry, happy or just simply content. So, to say that we don’t have a view on the decision-making that in some way effects our roads, our NHS or how we cycle.. is quite disingenuous.

Latest jobs Jobs web feed

  • Archive

    June 2012
    M T W T F S S
    « May   Jul »
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    252627282930  
  • Most read posts

    • No results available
  • Most commented

  • Tags