How we attract more supporters online without alienating existing donors

Charities are struggling to develop and pursue digital agendas because of the nature of the digital world -  extremely diverse and rapidly changing.

Organisations are faced with the dilemma of creating a new product that will build an immediate new group of donors, while maintaining a product to stay engaged with current donors who are often less digitally active. How can charities recruit new donors but not ‘forget’ about current supporters?

They should try to do both. Ideally, digital content should be produced and shared on as many digital platforms as possible. Intelligent tracking systems can help monitor who is sharing our content. Progress reports, annual reports and emergency appeals can all be produced digitally. We can engage with people through e-petitions and specific campaigns attached with specific campaign asks.

At Plan UK we have expertise on a range of issues, from gender to disasters and communications, and our digital strategy should channel that through blogs and articles written by staff. By demonstrating the expertise of our staff we can both target new donors (including corporates and statutory funds) and set ourselves aside from the crowded market. This will also enable us to engage a new group of individual donors who give a small amount of money. This framework can then be utilised to create a constituency of future long-term and more valuable givers, which is the aim of an effective fundraising strategy.

Print campaigns should not be stopped. Rather, we should reduce our print publications and cut costs by switching as much as we can to digital. That enables us to operate more efficiently and still service our less digitally-active supporters and some corporate sponsors who still rely/expect paper campaigns and updates for information.

Charities have the difficulty of engaging digitally with potential supporters, being digitally versatile and accessible beyond websites, and continuing to engage with existing supporters.

  • James Renton

    Peter this piece reads like a government inspired press material – top and tailed with Big Lottery stuff to personalise it – it could not possibly be in response to some round robin missive email from DCMS to promote Gamesmakers and volunteering? I also found the examples you chose rather curious. I know the really good work undertaken by BLF but one of the projects you mentioned was led by a local authority and is effectively helping them deliver the type of services they no longer have the resources to fund from their mainstream budgets (less than 1% of your budget goes to local authorities). The other was one was a project funded via your solicitation procedure i.e. lets find a project we like and offer them some dosh I am sure this appeals to the Victorian Philanthropist within you (with a bit of due diligence thrown in – upto 10% of the budget in England could go towards solicitation). I have nothing wrong with the projects per se but if I was you I would want to be highlighting the fact that my main focus was small local community projects who have competitively applied for funds – not showing I was spending money on just the opposite.

    • Peter Wanless

      No, James, all my own thoughts and words. I was genuinely inspired by the Gamesmakers and was keen to ensure that when people think about Olympic Legacy – especially the Government – they think well beyond elite sport and gold medals. As for the projects I mentioned, they are there to demonstrate the power and impact a selection of our projects have in relation to such a legacy. We’ll need to disagree on whether the way they’ve been funded detracts from this.

Latest jobs Jobs web feed

  • Archive

    September 2012
    M T W T F S S
    « Aug   Oct »
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
  • Most read posts

    • No results available
  • Most commented

  • Tags