There are many operational challenges to having a presence online

In my last blog I covered some of the strategic issues facing charities when they switch over to digital. So, what are the main ‘operational’ challenges?

The first issue is protection of brand representation and integrity. Controlling output from all those involved is difficult. Tweets, Facebook updates and blog pieces all need to be carefully worded so that the right message is being delivered. Charities will also find that their digital presence will also be used by supporters to make enquiries and mention grievances about their relationship with the organisation.

It is crucial that tight signposting techniques are in place so that the individual can be directed to the right department with the comfort of an acknowledgement. Some organisations may go a step further and use social media as a customer service contact point, like many big private sector brands; British Airways and T-Mobile for instance.

Digital media officers need to proactively monitor their organisation’s output and interactions. Care is specifically required when sharing content, as some posts seem innocent, but their hyperlinks can send you to inappropriate or dangerous websites. In addition, organisations should ensure communications policies are in place to protect staff and other associated individuals from derogatory comments coming from service users – which can vary from comments on how somebody looks to comments on their behaviour during a programme. This is especially true when working with young people who often don’t fully understand their relationships with staff and other participants.

Secondly, organisations must tighten their data protection controls. The consolidation of supporter information in one place poses several risks that need to be minimised through enhanced staff training, systems and software. Boards should be aware of this risk and actively encourage the strengthening of protective measures. This will also settle the nerves of individual givers and ensure the organisation meets fundraising standards.

My third point is specific to organisations working with vulnerable groups. If content is being shared to ‘tell a message’, then be careful and sensitive about the photos and videos that posted (if allowed at all). Ensure the location function is switched off so a picture just shared can’t be traced. Don’t identify individuals, locations or contact details which could open up routes of abuse by the people you’re protecting them from. Also, it is important to ensure vulnerable project participants aren’t easily identifiable via digital conversations or through the digital networks.  Lastly, a simple and straightforward guide sheet needs to be created to outline the restrictions on sharing images.

  • John Clarke

    There is plenty of opportunity for volunteering bodies to put themselves out there on the back of the success of the Olympic volunteers. Many have been featured in local papers, blogs and the like, using the Olympic ‘hook’ to convince editors and publishers that what they have been doing for years is finally newsworthy.

    However, the government has been more of a hindrance than a help. I too looked on with dismay at the creation of this new organisation, which simply does what a conservative government does best – assume everyone working in the third sector is stupid and needs an expensive, useless body run on ‘business principles’ to oversee them, tell them what to do and waste a lot of money that could be better spent by the organisations themselves.

  • Janet Thorne

    I can only agree with Rob – thrilled that the Olympics has raised the profile of volunteering, and updated the image of volunteering in the public mind but very disappointed that a new organisation is being set up which will duplicate rather than support the organisations who have the expertise and infrastructure to do the work. And 100% agree that the place where investment is most needed is in supporting more organisations to engage with volunteers more creatively and productively.

  • MARY ATKINS

    I can hardly belive that the government is seriously going to invets in YET ANOTHER volunteering organisation. Please don’t do it – again!

  • Chris Hornet

    Nick Hurd’s very words were that they would build on what works rather than spending money on ‘a lunch, a launch and a logo’. Although to be fair Join In was always about getting more people involved in sport rather than volunteering (which of course means that Govt hasn’t put any money directly into a volunteering legacy)

    Maybe we should just accept that there was never going to be an Olympic volunteering ‘legacy’. There was certainly never any real impetus from LOCOG/Govt for a volunteering legacy beforehand so why should we expect one to suddenly appear? Lets enjoy the limelight that volunteers and volunteering gained during the Olympics, learn a few lessons from it, be better as organisations at involving and manging volunteers and get back to normal life, rather than wait for this mythical beast to appear.

Latest jobs Jobs web feed

  • Archive

    October 2012
    M T W T F S S
    « Sep   Nov »
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  
  • Most read posts

    • No results available
  • Most commented

  • Tags